Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009
2009
View full specs →

Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 vs Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 and the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 measures 25,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 9,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 at 15,7 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 tips the scales at 3 986 lbs — 3 111 lbs less than the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 at 875 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 has a 180-hp advantage over the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013's 70-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 25,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model1625 Trio Tiller
Model2525 Pro Series
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (200 cm)
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise12°
Deadrise18℃
Weight - Detail875 lbs. (499 kg)
Weight - Detail3,986 lbs
Weight - kg396.89
Weight - kg1808.02
Weight - lbs.875
Weight - lbs.3986
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.52 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in
Height - DetailSides: 23 in. (58 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 38 in
Height - Meters0.58
Height - Meters0.97
Height - Inches23
Height - Inches38
Height [transom]20 in. (51 cm)
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet15.67
Length - Feet25
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 8 in. (478 cm)
Length overall - Detail25 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Meters4.78
Length overall - Meters7.87
Length overall - Inches188
Length overall - Inches31
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm) Bottom: 0.160 in. (4 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max70 hp
Engine max250 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 3 in
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight7,500 lbs

Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 vs Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 or the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009?
The Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 is the longer of the two at 25,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 comes in at 15,7 feet, making it roughly 9,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 or the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 has the edge at 875 lbs dry weight versus 3 986 lbs for the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 tops out at 70 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 measures 102" wide, compared to 79" for the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 and Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 and the Kingfisher 2525 Pro Series 2009 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.