Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013
2013
View full specs →

Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 vs Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013: A Close Look at Two Deep-V Boats

Both the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 and the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 are deep-V designs, both built in aluminium, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 at 16,0 ft versus Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 at 15,7 ft. At 950 lbs and 875 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 75 hp for the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 and 70 hp for the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 and Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model1625 Falcon
Model1625 Trio Tiller
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam80 in. (2.03 m)
Beam79 in. (200 cm)
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Inches80
Beam - Inches79
Deadrise12° constant
Deadrise12°
Weight - Detail950 lbs. (431 kg)
Weight - Detail875 lbs. (499 kg)
Weight - kg430.91
Weight - kg396.89
Weight - lbs.950
Weight - lbs.875
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.52 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.52 m)
Height - DetailSides: 29 in. (73 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 23 in. (58 cm)
Height - Meters0.74
Height - Meters0.58
Height - Inches29
Height - Inches23
Height [transom]20 in. (51 cm)
Height [transom]20 in. (51 cm)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet15.67
Length overall - Detail16 ft. (4.87 m)
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 8 in. (478 cm)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters4.78
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches188
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm) Bottom: 0.160 in. (4 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm) Bottom: 0.160 in. (4 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal. (75 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal20
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine max75 hp
Engine max70 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Weight2,100 lbs.
Trailer - Weightnot available

Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 vs Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 or the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013?
The Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 comes in at 15,7 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 or the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 has the edge at 875 lbs dry weight versus 950 lbs for the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 13 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane - the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 measures 80" wide, compared to 79" for the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 and Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Kingfisher 1625 Falcon 2013 and the Kingfisher 1625 Trio Tiller 2013 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.