Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 boat specs
Jeanneau
Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982
1982
View full specs →
VS
Jeanneau Rush 1979 boat specs
Jeanneau
Jeanneau Rush 1979
1979
View full specs →

Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 vs Jeanneau Rush 1979 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 vs Jeanneau Rush 1979 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 measures 31,4 feet overall (1979), giving it roughly 4,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 at 27,2 feet (1982). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Jeanneau Rush 1979 tips the scales at 7 055 lbs — 1 764 lbs less than the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 at 5 291 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Jeanneau Rush 1979 tops out at 18 hp. Engine specs for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 7 gal and 7 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Jeanneau Rush 1979 could be the deciding factor.

Both boats sit in a similar displacement bracket — 5 291 lbs for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 and 7 055 lbs for the Jeanneau Rush 1979. Comparable displacement means broadly similar seakeeping behaviour and load capacity, though hull form and ballast ratio will still produce noticeably different sailing characteristics.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 draws 5,7 ft, compared to 4,1 ft for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982. That 1,6-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 uses Sloop rigging. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 has a documented auxiliary engine of 18 hp.

Hull speed is rated at 6,8 knots for the Jeanneau Rush 1979 and 6,2 knots for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Jeanneau Rush 1979 carries 24 gallons versus 13 gallons on the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Jeanneau Rush 1979 at 31,4 ft offers more living space, greater range, and a more substantial offshore capability. The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 at 27,2 ft is the easier, lower-cost option — simpler to crew and a strong choice for coastal and day sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail27.20 ft
Length overall - Detail31.40 ft
Length - Feet27.2
Length - Feet31.4
Length overall - Meters8.29
Length overall - Meters9.57
Length overall - Inches326
Length overall - Inches377
Beam9.50 ft
Beam10.40 ft
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters3.17
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches125
Draft [max] - Detail4.11 ft
Draft [max] - Detail5.70 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.25
Draft [max] - Meters1.74
Draft [max] - Inches49
Draft [max] - Inches68
Displacement5291.00 lbs
Displacement7055.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 transom hung rudder
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helm1 tiller
Helm1 tiller
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal7.1
Fuel tank capacity - Gal7.4
Fuel tank capacity - Liters26.88
Fuel tank capacity - Liters28.01
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower18 hp
Performance
Maximum speed6.22
Maximum speed6.76
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity5
Sleeping capacity5
Cabins2
Cabins1
Head1
Head1
Water capacity13.2
Water capacity23.8
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 vs Jeanneau Rush 1979 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 or the Jeanneau Rush 1979?
The Jeanneau Rush 1979 is the longer of the two at 31,4 feet overall. The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 comes in at 27,2 feet, making it roughly 4,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 or the Jeanneau Rush 1979?
For trailering, the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 has the edge at 5 291 lbs dry weight versus 7 055 lbs for the Jeanneau Rush 1979. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Jeanneau Rush 1979 has a documented max rating of 18 hp. Engine specifications for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Jeanneau Rush 1979 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 or the Jeanneau Rush 1979?
The Jeanneau Rush 1979 has the deeper draft at 5,7 ft, versus 4,1 ft for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 or the Jeanneau Rush 1979 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 at 7 055 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 at 5 291 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 or the Jeanneau Rush 1979?
Based on rated hull speed, the Jeanneau Rush 1979 has an edge at 6,8 knots versus 6,2 knots for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Jeanneau Rush 1979 carries 24 gallons of fresh water compared to 13 gallons on the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Jeanneau Rush 1979 measures 125" wide, compared to 114" for the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 and Jeanneau Rush 1979?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 7 gallons and 7 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 and Jeanneau Rush 1979 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Jeanneau Fantasia 27 1982 and the Jeanneau Rush 1979 are built by Jeanneau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.