Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 boat specs
Grady-White
Grady-White Canyon 271 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 boat specs
Grady-White
Grady-White Canyon 283 2011
2011
View full specs →

Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 vs Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 at 26,8 ft versus Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 at 28,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 tips the scales at 5 864 lbs — 5 285 lbs less than the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 at 579 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 600 hp for the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and 600 hp for the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 202 gal and 205 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeGrady-White
MakeGrady-White
ModelCanyon 271
ModelCanyon 283
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.89 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.90 m)
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches114
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 11 in. (2.11 m) With T-Top: 8 ft. 2 in. (2.49 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 7 in. (2.31 m) With T-top: 9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.49
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Inches98
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Depth - DetailCockpit: 27 in. (0.69 m)
Depth - DetailCockpit: 27 in. (0.69 m)
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Inches27
Depth - Inches27
Draft [max] - DetailHull: 23 in. (0.58 m)
Draft [max] - DetailHull: 20 in. (0.51 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.58
Draft [max] - Meters0.51
Draft [max] - Inches23
Draft [max] - Inches2
Weight - DetailWithout Engine: 5,790 lbs. (2,626 kg)
Weight - DetailWithout Engines: 5,864 lbs. (2,660 kg)
Weight - kg2626.3
Weight - kg2659.86
Weight - lbs.579
Weight - lbs.5864
Width [transom] - Detail8 ft. 9 in. (2.67 m)
Width [transom] - Detail9 ft. (2.74 m)
Length - Feet26.83
Length - Feet28
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 10 in. (8.18 m)
Length overall - Detail28 ft. (8.53 m)
Length overall - Meters8.18
Length overall - Meters8.53
Length overall - Inches322
Length overall - Inches336
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail202 gal. (765 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail205 gal. (776 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters764.65
Fuel tank capacity - Liters776.01
Fuel tank capacity - Gal202
Fuel tank capacity - Gal205
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max600 hp (441 kW)
Engine max600 hp (448 kW) with V6 engines only
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard

Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 vs Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 or the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011?
The Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 comes in at 26,8 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 or the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011?
For trailering, the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 has the edge at 579 lbs dry weight versus 5 864 lbs for the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 share an 9 ft. 6 in. (2.89 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 or the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011?
The Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 has the bigger tank at 205 gallons, versus 202 gallons on the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Grady-White Canyon 271 2013 and the Grady-White Canyon 283 2011 are built by Grady-White. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.