Glastron GTS 229 2013 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron GTS 229 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Glastron MX 185 2010 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron MX 185 2010
2010
View full specs →

Glastron GTS 229 2013 vs Glastron MX 185 2010 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Glastron GTS 229 2013 and the Glastron MX 185 2010 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Glastron GTS 229 2013 measures 22,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Glastron MX 185 2010 at 18,4 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Glastron MX 185 2010 tips the scales at 228 lbs — 195 lbs less than the Glastron GTS 229 2013 at 33 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Glastron GTS 229 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Glastron MX 185 2010 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Glastron GTS 229 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Glastron GTS 229 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Glastron MX 185 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeGlastron
MakeGlastron
ModelGTS 229
ModelMX 185
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Beam88 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches1
Beam - Inches88
Bridge clearance - Detail4 ft. 3 in. (1.3 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters1.3
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches51
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise20°
Deadrise21℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (43 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (0.41 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail3,300 lbs. (1,500 kg)
Weight - Detail2,280 lbs. (1,035 kg) with engine
Weight - kg1496.85
Weight - kg1034.19
Weight - lbs.33
Weight - lbs.228
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet18.42
Length overall - Detail22 ft. (6.71 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in. (5.61 m)
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Inches264
Length overall - Inches221
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail44 in. (1.12 m) Cockpit: 28.5 in. (0.72 m) Maximum: 57 in. (1.45 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters144.78
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches57
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail86 in. (2.18 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal. (151 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs. (726 kg)
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum people9
Maximum people7 or 1,000 lbs. (454 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Height7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m)
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. (7.19 m)
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 10 in. (6.65 m)
Trailer - Weight1,095 lbs. (497 kg)
Trailer - Weightnot available

Glastron GTS 229 2013 vs Glastron MX 185 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Glastron GTS 229 2013 or the Glastron MX 185 2010?
The Glastron GTS 229 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Glastron MX 185 2010 comes in at 18,4 feet, making it roughly 3,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Glastron GTS 229 2013 or the Glastron MX 185 2010?
For trailering, the Glastron GTS 229 2013 has the edge at 33 lbs dry weight versus 228 lbs for the Glastron MX 185 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Glastron GTS 229 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Glastron MX 185 2010 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Glastron MX 185 2010 measures 88" wide, compared to 1" for the Glastron GTS 229 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Glastron GTS 229 2013 or the Glastron MX 185 2010?
The Glastron MX 185 2010 has the bigger tank at 23 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Glastron GTS 229 2013. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Glastron GTS 229 2013 and Glastron MX 185 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Glastron GTS 229 2013 and the Glastron MX 185 2010 are built by Glastron. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.