Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron GS 289 SC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Glastron GT 185 2009 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron GT 185 2009
2009
View full specs →

Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 vs Glastron GT 185 2009 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 and the Glastron GT 185 2009 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 measures 30,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 12,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Glastron GT 185 2009 at 18,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Glastron GT 185 2009 tips the scales at 2 315 lbs — 2 250 lbs less than the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 at 65 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 at 30,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Glastron GT 185 2009 at 18,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeGlastron
MakeGlastron
ModelGS 289 SC
ModelGT 185
Model Year201
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam109 in. (2.77 m)
Beam88 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches109
Beam - Inches88
Bridge clearance - Detail83 in. (2.11 m) without arch 98 in. (2.49 m) with arch
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.49
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches98
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise21℃
Depth - Detail101 in. (2.57 m) Cockpit: 30 in. (0.76 m) Maximum: 109 in. (2.77 m)
Depth - Detail44 in. (1.12 m) Cockpit: 28.5 in. (0.72 m)
Depth - Centimeters276.86
Depth - Centimeters111.76
Depth - Inches109
Depth - Inches44
Draft [drive up] - Detail28 in. (0.71 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.71
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches28
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail41 in. (1.04 m)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Meters1.04
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches41
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail6,500 lbs. (2,948 kg) with engine
Weight - Detail2,315 lbs. (1,050 kg)
Weight - kg2948.35
Weight - kg1050.07
Weight - lbs.65
Weight - lbs.2315
Width [transom] - Detail100 in. (2.54 m)
Width [transom] - Detail86 in. (2.18 m)
Length - Feet30.33
Length - Feet18
Length [over all with swim platform]30 ft. 4 in. (9.25 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]18 ft. 5 in. (5.61 m)
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters8.79
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches346
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.61
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches5
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,150 lbs. (522 kg)
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people8
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 10 in. (6.65 m)

Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 vs Glastron GT 185 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 or the Glastron GT 185 2009?
The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 is the longer of the two at 30,3 feet overall. The Glastron GT 185 2009 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 12,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 or the Glastron GT 185 2009?
For trailering, the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 has the edge at 65 lbs dry weight versus 2 315 lbs for the Glastron GT 185 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Glastron GT 185 2009 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 measures 109" wide, compared to 88" for the Glastron GT 185 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 or the Glastron GT 185 2009?
The Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 has the bigger tank at 84 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Glastron GT 185 2009. That 61-gallon difference translates to roughly 183–305 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 and Glastron GT 185 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Glastron GS 289 SC 2010 and the Glastron GT 185 2009 are built by Glastron. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.