Glastron GLS 195 2010 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron GLS 195 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Glastron GT 200 2012 boat specs
Glastron
Glastron GT 200 2012
2012
View full specs →

Glastron GLS 195 2010 vs Glastron GT 200 2012 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Glastron GLS 195 2010 and the Glastron GT 200 2012 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Glastron GLS 195 2010 at 19,3 ft versus Glastron GT 200 2012 at 20,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Glastron GLS 195 2010 tips the scales at 2 915 lbs — 2 893 lbs more than the Glastron GT 200 2012 at 22 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Glastron GT 200 2012 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Glastron GLS 195 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 34 gal and 32 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 9 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Glastron GLS 195 2010 and Glastron GT 200 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeGlastron
MakeGlastron
ModelGLS 195
ModelGT 2
Model Year201
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94 in. (2.39 m)
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise21℃
Deadrise21℃
Depth - Detail49.5 in. (1.26 m) Cockpit: 33.5 in. (0.85 m) Maximum: 62.5 in. (1.59 m)
Depth - DetailCockpit: 31 in. (79 cm)
Depth - Centimeters160.02
Depth - Centimeters78.74
Depth - Inches62.5
Depth - Inches31
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (0.41 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail29 in. (0.74 m)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.74
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches29
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail2,915 lbs. (1,322 kg) with engine
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs. (998 kg)
Weight - kg1322.22
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - lbs.2915
Weight - lbs.22
Width [transom] - Detail90 in. (2.29 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Length - Feet19.33
Length - Feet20.33
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 4 in. (5.89 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 4 in. (6.2 m)
Length overall - Meters5.89
Length overall - Meters6.2
Length overall - Inches232
Length overall - Inches244
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal. (121 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelnot available
Engine model115 EXLPT Optimax
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower115 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine max200 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,350 lbs. (612 kg)
Maximum capacity2,200 lbs. (998 kg)
Maximum people9 or 1,350 lbs. (612 kg)
Maximum people9
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in. (6.81 m)
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 4 in. (6.2 m)

Glastron GLS 195 2010 vs Glastron GT 200 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Glastron GLS 195 2010 or the Glastron GT 200 2012?
The Glastron GT 200 2012 is the longer of the two at 20,3 feet overall. The Glastron GLS 195 2010 comes in at 19,3 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Glastron GLS 195 2010 or the Glastron GT 200 2012?
For trailering, the Glastron GT 200 2012 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 2 915 lbs for the Glastron GLS 195 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Glastron GT 200 2012 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Glastron GLS 195 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Glastron GLS 195 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Glastron GT 200 2012 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Glastron GT 200 2012 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Glastron GLS 195 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Glastron GLS 195 2010 and Glastron GT 200 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 34 gallons and 32 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Glastron GLS 195 2010 and Glastron GT 200 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Glastron GLS 195 2010 and the Glastron GT 200 2012 are built by Glastron. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.