Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 boat specs
Glasstream
Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Glasstream 180 CC 2013 boat specs
Glasstream
Glasstream 180 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →

Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 vs Glasstream 180 CC 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 against a modified vee Glasstream 180 CC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 at 16,8 ft versus Glasstream 180 CC 2013 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 tips the scales at 1 175 lbs — 1 160 lbs more than the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 at 15 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 has a 55-hp advantage over the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 25 gal and 25 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Glasstream 180 CC 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 20 lbs per hp for the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeGlasstream
MakeGlasstream
Model17 Flats Flite
Model180 CC
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam80 in
Beam7 ft. 2 in
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Inches8
Beam - Inches86
Weight - Detail1,175 lbs
Weight - Detail1,500 lbs
Weight - kg532.97
Weight - kg680.39
Weight - lbs.1175
Weight - lbs.15
Length - Feet16.83
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailCockpit Freeboard: 26 in. Cockpit Width: 74 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters187.96
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches74
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail25 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Liters94.64
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
HorsepowerRated: 60-115 hp
HorsepowerRated: 115 hp

Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 vs Glasstream 180 CC 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 or the Glasstream 180 CC 2013?
The Glasstream 180 CC 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 comes in at 16,8 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 or the Glasstream 180 CC 2013?
For trailering, the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 has the edge at 15 lbs dry weight versus 1 175 lbs for the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Glasstream 180 CC 2013 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Glasstream 180 CC 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 20 lbs per hp for the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Glasstream 180 CC 2013 measures 86" wide, compared to 8" for the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 and Glasstream 180 CC 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 25 gallons and 25 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 and Glasstream 180 CC 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Glasstream 17 Flats Flite 2009 and the Glasstream 180 CC 2013 are built by Glasstream. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.