G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012
2012
View full specs →

G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 vs G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 against a pontoon G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 at 19,0 ft versus G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 tips the scales at 1 085 lbs — 923 lbs more than the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 at 162 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 has a 40-hp advantage over the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 carries 27 gallons versus 2 gallons in the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 with its 75-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeG3 Boats
MakeG3 Boats
Model1966 CC
ModelLV 188 C
Model Year2012
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam91 in
Beam102 in. deck width
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches91
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise6℃
Deadrisenot available
Depth - Detail28 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches28
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,085 lbs
Weight - Detail1,620 lbs
Weight - kg492.15
Weight - kg734.82
Weight - lbs.1085
Weight - lbs.162
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail19 ft
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches228
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]18 ft
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 ga
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeFlat
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeYamaha
Engine makeYamaha
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max75 hp
Operational Info
StorageLivewells: 11 x 21 in., 16 gal.; 14 x 34 in., 31 gal
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,755 lbs
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum people8
Maximum people8
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 10 in. (deduct 20 in. with Trail Guard tongue removed)
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 8 in
Trailer - Weight2,195 lbs
Trailer - Weight2,650 lbs
Trailer - Width92 in
Trailer - Width102 in
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge0.080 Nosecone Gauge: 0.1

G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 vs G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 or the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012?
The G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 or the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012?
For trailering, the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 has the edge at 162 lbs dry weight versus 1 085 lbs for the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 measures 102" wide, compared to 91" for the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 or the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012?
The G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 has the bigger tank at 27 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012. That 25-gallon difference translates to roughly 75–125 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 and G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the G3 Boats 1966 CC 2012 and the G3 Boats LV 188 C 2012 are built by G3 Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.