Matching a modified vee G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 against a deep vee G3 Boats Guide V16 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 at 17,0 ft versus G3 Boats Guide V16 2010 at 15,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 tips the scales at 805 lbs — 759 lbs more than the G3 Boats Guide V16 2010 at 46 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 has a 30-hp advantage over the G3 Boats Guide V16 2010's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The G3 Boats Guide V16 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the G3 Boats Guide V16 2010 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.