Matching a tunnel G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2010 against a modified vee G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2010 at 18,1 ft versus G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 tips the scales at 805 lbs — 722 lbs less than the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2010 at 83 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2010 and 90 hp for the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats 1860 SC Camo 2008 carries 21 gallons versus 12 gallons in the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.