G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ   2011 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011
2011
View full specs →

G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 vs G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 against a tunnel G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 at 17,1 ft versus G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 at 18,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 tips the scales at 885 lbs — 802 lbs more than the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 at 83 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 and 90 hp for the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 carries 12 gallons versus 2 gallons in the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 and G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeG3 Boats
MakeG3 Boats
Model1860 CC
ModelJet Tunnel 1860 CCJ
Model Year201
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam86 in
Beam80 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches8
Deadrise6℃
Deadrise0℃
Depth - Detail26 in
Depth - Detail24 in
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inches26
Depth - Inches24
Weight - Detail885 lbs
Weight - Detail830 lbs
Weight - kg401.43
Weight - kg376.48
Weight - lbs.885
Weight - lbs.83
Width [transom] - Detail60 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]29 in
Length - Feet17.08
Length - Feet18.08
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters5.21
Length overall - Meters5.51
Length overall - Inches205
Length overall - Inches217
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 ga
Hull thickness0.100 ga
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeTunnel
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardYamaha
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail12 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Liters45.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal12
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeJet Drive
Engine max90 hp
Engine max90 / 65J
Engine makenot available
Engine makeYamaha
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 11 x 21 in., 16 gal. Livewell: 14 x 34 in., 31 gal
StorageLivewell: 15 x 25 in., 19 gal
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailTrail Guard?
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 0 in. Deduct 20 in. with Trail Guard tongue removed
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 7 in. (deduct 20 in. with Trail Guard tongue removed)
Trailer - Weight1,755 lbs
Trailer - Weight1,690 lbs
Trailer - Width86 in
Trailer - Width85 in

G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 vs G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 or the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011?
The G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 is the longer of the two at 18,1 feet overall. The G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 comes in at 17,1 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 or the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011?
For trailering, the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 has the edge at 83 lbs dry weight versus 885 lbs for the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 measures 86" wide, compared to 8" for the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 or the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011?
The G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 has the bigger tank at 12 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010. That 10-gallon difference translates to roughly 30–50 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 and G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the G3 Boats 1860 CC 2010 and the G3 Boats Jet Tunnel 1860 CCJ 2011 are built by G3 Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.