Matching a modified vee G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010 against a tunnel G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010 at 15,8 ft versus G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 at 18,0 ft. At 52 lbs and 82 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 has a 40-hp advantage over the G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 carries 12 gallons versus 6 gallons in the G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 is rated for 6 passengers, while the G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The G3 Boats 1860 CCJ 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the G3 Boats 1652 WOF 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.