G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 boat specs
G3 Boats
G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010
2010
View full specs →

G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 vs G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 against a modified vee G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 at 15,8 ft versus G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 at 18,7 ft. At 66 lbs and 115 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 has a 90-hp advantage over the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 carries 21 gallons versus 9 gallons in the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 at 18,7 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 at 15,8 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeG3 Boats
MakeG3 Boats
Model1652 SC
ModelEagle 19
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam71 in
Beam85 in
Beam - Meters1.8
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Inches71
Beam - Inches85
Deadrise3℃
Deadrise12℃
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Detail25 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches25
Weight - Detail660 lbs
Weight - Detail1,150 lbs
Weight - kg299.37
Weight - kg521.63
Weight - lbs.66
Weight - lbs.115
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 52 in
Width [transom] - Detail58 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet15.83
Length - Feet18.67
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Inches19
Length overall - Inches224
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 ga
Hull thickness0.100 ga
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeYamaha
Engine makenot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail9 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters34.07
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal9
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max150 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardYamaha
Operational Info
StorageLivewell: 16 x 20 in., 15 gal
StorageLivewell: 14 x 41 in., 27 gal
Maximum capacity1,000 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people4
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 10 in. (deduct 20 in. with Trail Guard tongue removed)
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 10 in. Deduct 20 in. with Trail Guard tongue removed
Trailer - Weight1,400 lbs
Trailer - Weight2,100 lbs
Trailer - Width76 in
Trailer - Width85 in

G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 vs G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 or the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010?
The G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 comes in at 15,8 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 or the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010?
For trailering, the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 has the edge at 66 lbs dry weight versus 115 lbs for the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 measures 85" wide, compared to 71" for the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 or the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010?
The G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 has the bigger tank at 21 gallons, versus 9 gallons on the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013. That 12-gallon difference translates to roughly 36–60 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 and G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2013 and the G3 Boats Eagle 190 2010 are built by G3 Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.