Matching a flat G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012 against a modified vee G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012 at 15,8 ft versus G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 at 17,7 ft. At 66 lbs and 11 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 has a 55-hp advantage over the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 carries 21 gallons versus 12 gallons in the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the G3 Boats Eagle 180 2012 and its 115-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the G3 Boats 1652 SC 2012 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.