Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Fisher Liberty 180 2009 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher Liberty 180 2009
2009
View full specs →

Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 vs Fisher Liberty 180 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 against a pontoon Fisher Liberty 180 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 at 18,0 ft versus Fisher Liberty 180 2009 at 19,0 ft. At 147 lbs and 189 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 has a 100-hp advantage over the Fisher Liberty 180 2009's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Fisher Liberty 180 2009 carries 19 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Fisher Liberty 180 2009 with its 75-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeFisher
MakeFisher
ModelHawk 186 WT
ModelLiberty 18
Model Year2008
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in
Beam98 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches98
Deadrise19℃
Deadrisenot available
Depth - Detail27 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters68.58
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches27
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,470 lbs
Weight - Detail1,890 lbs
Weight - kg666.78
Weight - kg857.29
Weight - lbs.147
Weight - lbs.189
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 82 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet19
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches11
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters6.07
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches239
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max75 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,755 lbs
Maximum capacity1,640 lbs
Maximum people7 / 1,050 lbs
Maximum people7 / 970 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailFactory-matched custom
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allPackage Length with Swing-Away: 21 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter24 in
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge0.08 in
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2

Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 vs Fisher Liberty 180 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 or the Fisher Liberty 180 2009?
The Fisher Liberty 180 2009 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 or the Fisher Liberty 180 2009?
For trailering, the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 has the edge at 147 lbs dry weight versus 189 lbs for the Fisher Liberty 180 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Fisher Liberty 180 2009 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Fisher Liberty 180 2009 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 and Fisher Liberty 180 2009 share an 98 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 or the Fisher Liberty 180 2009?
The Fisher Liberty 180 2009 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 and Fisher Liberty 180 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2008 and the Fisher Liberty 180 2009 are built by Fisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.