The Fisher Hawk 160 WT 2004 vs Fisher Hawk 170 SC 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Fisher Hawk 170 SC 2004 has a 116-hp advantage over the Fisher Hawk 160 WT 2004's 9-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Fisher Hawk 160 WT 2004 carries 24 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Fisher Hawk 170 SC 2004. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Fisher Hawk 170 SC 2004 and its 125-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Fisher Hawk 160 WT 2004 with its 9-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.