Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004
2004
View full specs →
VS
Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001
2001
View full specs →

Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 vs Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 vs Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 carries a rated maximum of 9 hp. Engine data for the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 and Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeFisher
MakeFisher
ModelHawk 160 SC
ModelMV 1848 AW
Model Year2004
Model Year2001
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam92 in
Beam70"
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches7
Draft [drive up] - DetailN/A
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Weight - Detail1295 Lbs
Weight - Detail405 lbs
Weight - kg587.4
Weight - kg183.7
Weight - lbs.1295
Weight - lbs.405
Height - DetailN/A
Height - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail18' 1"
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches216
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]L
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 Gallons
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Engine max9
Engine maxnot available
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard40 hp
Operational Info
Water capacityN/A
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1300 Lbs
Maximum capacity1250 lbs
Maximum people5 Persons
Maximum people5 persons
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailSee additional features above
Trailer - Detailnot available

Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 vs Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 or the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001?
For trailering, the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 has the edge at 405 lbs dry weight versus 1 295 lbs for the Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 has a documented max rating of 9 hp. Engine specifications for the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 measures 92" wide, compared to 7" for the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 and Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Fisher Hawk 160 SC 2004 and the Fisher MV 1848 AW 2001 are built by Fisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.