Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom  2006 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006
2006
View full specs →

Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 at 13,0 ft versus Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 tips the scales at 445 lbs — 290 lbs less than the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 at 155 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 has a 25-hp advantage over the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeFisher
MakeFisher
Model1436 LW Riveted Jon
Model1654 AW S Flat Bottom
Model Year2007
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam53 in
Beam76 in. Bottom Width: 54 in
Beam - Meters1.35
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches53
Beam - Inches76
Weight - Detail155 lbs
Weight - Detail445 lbs
Weight - kg70.31
Weight - kg201.85
Weight - lbs.155
Weight - lbs.445
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 36 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]15 in
Length - Feet13
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches11
Length - Inches4
Length overall - Detail13 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters4.24
Length overall - Meters4.98
Length overall - Inches167
Length overall - Inches196
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.063 in
Hull thickness0.100 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max15 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity651 lbs
Maximum capacity1,065 lbs
Maximum people3
Maximum people5

Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 or the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006?
The Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 comes in at 13,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 or the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006?
For trailering, the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 has the edge at 155 lbs dry weight versus 445 lbs for the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 11 lbs per hp for the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 measures 76" wide, compared to 53" for the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 and Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Fisher 1436 LW Riveted Jon 2007 and the Fisher 1654 AW S Flat Bottom 2006 are built by Fisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.