Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 boat specs
Fisher
Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006
2006
View full specs →

Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 measures 18,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 17,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 at 1,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 tips the scales at 147 lbs — 139 lbs less than the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 has a 172-hp advantage over the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 3 lbs per hp for the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeFisher
MakeFisher
Model1032 Riveted Jon
ModelHawk 186 WT
Model Year2007
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam45 in
Beam98 in
Beam - Meters1.14
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches45
Beam - Inches98
Weight - Detail80 lbs
Weight - Detail1,470 lbs
Weight - kg36.29
Weight - kg666.78
Weight - lbs.8
Weight - lbs.147
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 32 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 82 in
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet1
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail10 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters3.05
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches12
Length overall - Inches222
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.043 in
Hull thickness0.100 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max3 hp
Engine max175 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Operational Info
Maximum capacity354 lbs
Maximum capacity1,755 lbs
Maximum people2
Maximum people7
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailFactory-matched custom

Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 vs Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 or the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 comes in at 1,0 feet, making it roughly 17,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 or the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006?
For trailering, the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 has the edge at 8 lbs dry weight versus 147 lbs for the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 3 lbs per hp for the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 measures 98" wide, compared to 45" for the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 and Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Fisher 1032 Riveted Jon 2007 and the Fisher Hawk 186 WT 2006 are built by Fisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.