Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 boat specs
Ericson Yachts
Ericson Yachts 36C 1978
1978
View full specs →
VS
Ericson Yachts 381 1983 boat specs
Ericson Yachts
Ericson Yachts 381 1983
1983
View full specs →

Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 vs Ericson Yachts 381 1983 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 vs Ericson Yachts 381 1983 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 at 36,0 ft versus Ericson Yachts 381 1983 at 38,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 tips the scales at 16 000 lbs — 1 100 lbs more than the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 at 14 900 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 28 hp for the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 and 32 hp for the Ericson Yachts 381 1983. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 carries 27 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Ericson Yachts 381 1983. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Ericson Yachts 381 1983 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 could be the deciding factor.

Both boats sit in a similar displacement bracket — 16 000 lbs for the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 and 14 900 lbs for the Ericson Yachts 381 1983. Comparable displacement means broadly similar seakeeping behaviour and load capacity, though hull form and ballast ratio will still produce noticeably different sailing characteristics.

Sailboat comparisons often come down to details that specs don't fully capture — the quality of the standing rigging, the layout of the cockpit, and how the boat feels on a beat in 20 knots. A sea trial on both is strongly recommended.

Bottom line: The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 and Ericson Yachts 381 1983 are closely matched on paper. A sea trial on both in representative conditions is the only reliable way to find which one suits your sailing style, home port, and intended cruising ground.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail36.00 ft
Length overall - Detail38.00 ft
Length - Feet36
Length - Feet38
Length overall - Meters10.97
Length overall - Meters11.58
Length overall - Inches432
Length overall - Inches456
Draft [max] - Detail5.42 ft
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters1.65
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches65
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Displacement16000.00 lbs
Displacement14900.00 lbs
Draft Minnot available
Draft Min6.50 ft
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Engine makeYanmar
Engine makeUniversal
Horsepower28 hp
Horsepower32 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Operational Info
Cabins2
Cabinsnot available
Head1
Head1
Water capacity4
Water capacity8
Holding tank capacity - Gal9
Holding tank capacity - Gal25
Holding tank capacity - Liters34.07
Holding tank capacity - Liters94.64
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 vs Ericson Yachts 381 1983 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 or the Ericson Yachts 381 1983?
The Ericson Yachts 381 1983 is the longer of the two at 38,0 feet overall. The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 comes in at 36,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 or the Ericson Yachts 381 1983?
For trailering, the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 has the edge at 14 900 lbs dry weight versus 16 000 lbs for the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
What is the draft of the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978?
The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 draws 5,4 ft. Draft determines which harbours, anchorages, and haul-out facilities are accessible — always verify with your local marina before purchase.
Is the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 or the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 at 16 000 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Ericson Yachts 381 1983 at 14 900 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 or the Ericson Yachts 381 1983?
The Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 has the bigger tank at 27 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Ericson Yachts 381 1983. That 21-gallon difference translates to roughly 63–105 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 and Ericson Yachts 381 1983 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Ericson Yachts 36C 1978 and the Ericson Yachts 381 1983 are built by Ericson Yachts. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.