Matching a modified vee Duckworth 26 2010 against a deep vee Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Duckworth 26 2010 at 26,0 ft versus Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012 at 24,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012 tips the scales at 372 lbs — 325 lbs less than the Duckworth 26 2010 at 47 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Duckworth 26 2010 carries a rated maximum of 500 hp. Engine data for the Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Duckworth 26 2010 carries 13 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Duckworth 26 2010 and Duckworth Ultra Magnum Inboard Jet 24 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.