Matching a modified vee Crestliner Fish Hawk 1750 WT 2011 against a deep vee Crestliner Pro Tiller 1650 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Crestliner Fish Hawk 1750 WT 2011 at 17,5 ft versus Crestliner Pro Tiller 1650 2012 at 16,7 ft. At 11 lbs and 1 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1750 WT 2011 has a 65-hp advantage over the Crestliner Pro Tiller 1650 2012's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1750 WT 2011 carries 24 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Crestliner Pro Tiller 1650 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner Pro Tiller 1650 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 0 lbs per hp for the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1750 WT 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.