Matching a deep vee Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 against a modified vee Crestliner TC 17 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 at 16,7 ft versus Crestliner TC 17 2011 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner TC 17 2011 tips the scales at 966 lbs — 860 lbs less than the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 at 106 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 and 75 hp for the Crestliner TC 17 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Crestliner TC 17 2011 carries 12 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Crestliner TC 17 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Crestliner TC 17 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.