Matching a modified vee Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011 against a deep vee Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 measures 20,2 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011 at 16,7 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 tips the scales at 1 425 lbs — 1 319 lbs less than the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011 at 106 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 has a 160-hp advantage over the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 carries 6 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Crestliner Tournament 202 WT 2012 at 20,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 DC 2011 at 16,7 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.