The Crestliner CX 1754 2005 vs Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Crestliner CX 1754 2005 at 17,0 ft versus Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013 at 16,0 ft. At 800 lbs and 880 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Crestliner CX 1754 2005 has a 30-hp advantage over the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013's 60-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads - 21 gal and 23 gal - so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Crestliner CX 1754 2005 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner CX 1754 2005 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1600 SC 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Crestliner CX 1754 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.