Matching a flat Crestliner CR 1648M 2013 against a deep vee Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Crestliner CR 1648M 2013 at 15,8 ft versus Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 at 16,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner CR 1648M 2013 tips the scales at 275 lbs — 169 lbs more than the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 at 106 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 has a 55-hp advantage over the Crestliner CR 1648M 2013's 35-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Crestliner CR 1648M 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner Fish Hawk 1650 WT 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 8 lbs per hp for the Crestliner CR 1648M 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.