Matching a flat Crestliner CR 1236 2013 against a modified vee Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008 measures 16,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 4,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Crestliner CR 1236 2013 at 11,9 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008 tips the scales at 825 lbs — 811 lbs less than the Crestliner CR 1236 2013 at 14 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008 has a 50-hp advantage over the Crestliner CR 1236 2013's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 3 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner CR 1236 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Crestliner CXJ 1655 SC 2008 at 16,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Crestliner CR 1236 2013 at 11,9 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.