The Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 vs Crestliner CR 1648M 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Crestliner CR 1648M 2010 at 15,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 tips the scales at 1 100 lbs - 680 lbs more than the Crestliner CR 1648M 2010 at 420 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 has a 90-hp advantage over the Crestliner CR 1648M 2010's 35-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Crestliner CR 1648M 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Crestliner CMV 1750 2006 and its 125-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Crestliner CR 1648M 2010 with its 35-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.