Matching a modified vee Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 against a deep vee Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 at 17,0 ft versus Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012 at 14,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 tips the scales at 975 lbs — 290 lbs more than the Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012 at 685 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 and 40 hp for the Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 comes in at 16 lbs per hp versus 17 lbs per hp for the Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Crestliner C 1760 VS 2007 at 17,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Crestliner Kodiak 14 SC 2012 at 14,8 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.