The Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012 vs Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 measures 25,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 5,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012 at 19,5 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 tips the scales at 2 924 lbs — 2 903 lbs less than the Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 has a 60-hp advantage over the Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 is rated for 16 passengers, while the Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Crest Crest III XRS 25 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 16 passengers and at 25,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Crest Crest II Fish 190FC 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.