Matching a modified vee Charger 496 2012 against a deep vee Charger SUV 210 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Charger 496 2012 at 20,5 ft versus Charger SUV 210 2010 at 20,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Charger 496 2012 tips the scales at 165 lbs — 146 lbs more than the Charger SUV 210 2010 at 19 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 6 hp for the Charger 496 2012 and 6 hp for the Charger SUV 210 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Charger 496 2012 carries 44 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Charger SUV 210 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Charger 496 2012 and Charger SUV 210 2010 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.