The Charger 296 2012 is a modified-V design and the Charger SUV 190 2011 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Charger 296 2012 at 19,3 ft versus Charger SUV 190 2011 at 19,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Charger SUV 190 2011 tips the scales at 1 800 lbs - 300 lbs less than the Charger 296 2012 at 1 500 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 200 hp for the Charger 296 2012 and 200 hp for the Charger SUV 190 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Charger SUV 190 2011 carries 50 gallons versus 44 gallons in the Charger 296 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Charger 296 2012 and Charger SUV 190 2011 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.