Charger 186 DC 2006 boat specs
Charger
Charger 186 DC 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Charger 475 2008 boat specs
Charger
Charger 475 2008
2008
View full specs →

Charger 186 DC 2006 vs Charger 475 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Charger 186 DC 2006 vs Charger 475 2008 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Charger 186 DC 2006 measures 18,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Charger 475 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). At 13 lbs and 18 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Charger 186 DC 2006 has a 169-hp advantage over the Charger 475 2008's 6-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 4 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Charger 475 2008 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Charger 186 DC 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Charger 475 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Charger 186 DC 2006 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 3 lbs per hp for the Charger 475 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Charger 475 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Charger 186 DC 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeCharger
MakeCharger
Model186 DC
Model475
Model Year2006
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam93 in
Beam92 in
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Inches93
Beam - Inches92
Depth - DetailMolded Depth: 41 in
Depth - DetailMolded Depth: 40 in
Depth - Centimeters104.14
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Inches41
Depth - Inches4
Weight - Detail1,300 lbs
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - kg589.67
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - lbs.13
Weight - lbs.18
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet2
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches11
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters6.38
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches251
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine maxUnlimited V-6
Operational Info
Storage10 compartments
Storage9 compartments
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum capacity1,550 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people6 / 900 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 11 in. Swing Away Tongue: 20 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 8 in. Swing Away Tongue: 23 ft

Charger 186 DC 2006 vs Charger 475 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Charger 186 DC 2006 or the Charger 475 2008?
The Charger 186 DC 2006 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Charger 475 2008 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Charger 186 DC 2006 or the Charger 475 2008?
For trailering, the Charger 186 DC 2006 has the edge at 13 lbs dry weight versus 18 lbs for the Charger 475 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Charger 186 DC 2006 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Charger 475 2008 tops out at 6 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Charger 186 DC 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Charger 475 2008 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Charger 186 DC 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 3 lbs per hp for the Charger 475 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Charger 186 DC 2006 measures 93" wide, compared to 92" for the Charger 475 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Charger 186 DC 2006 and Charger 475 2008?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 3 gallons and 4 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Charger 186 DC 2006 and Charger 475 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Charger 186 DC 2006 and the Charger 475 2008 are built by Charger. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.