Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 287 2011 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 287 2011
2011
View full specs →

Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 vs Chaparral SSX 287 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 against a modified vee Chaparral SSX 287 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 at 26,0 ft versus Chaparral SSX 287 2011 at 28,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 tips the scales at 5 275 lbs — 5 207 lbs more than the Chaparral SSX 287 2011 at 68 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 425 hp for the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 and 430 hp for the Chaparral SSX 287 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral SSX 287 2011 carries 105 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Chaparral SSX 287 2011 at 28,8 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 at 26,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
ModelSSi 256 Bow Rider
ModelSSX 287
Model Year2008
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches108
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m) Without Arch: 5 ft. 4 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Radar Arch: 8 ft. 9 in. (2.67 m) Without Radar Arch: 6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Meters2.67
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Bridge clearance - Inches105
Deadrise22.5℃
Deadrise22°
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail5,275 lbs. (2,393 kg)
Weight - Detail6,800 lbs. (3,084 kg)
Weight - kg2392.7
Weight - kg3084.43
Weight - lbs.5275
Weight - lbs.68
Length - Meters8.05
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet28.83
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Max no of engines1
Max no of enginesnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.7 Gi MPi DP drive 300 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail105 gal. (397 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters397.47
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max425 hp (317 kW)
Engine max430 hp (321 kW)
Operational Info
Head1
Headnot available
Water capacity10 gal. (38 l)
Water capacity14 gal. (53 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l) With Optional VacuFlush: 6.5 gal. (23.95 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters26.5
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Gal6.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Headroomnot available
Headroom5 ft. 3 in. (1.6 m)

Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 vs Chaparral SSX 287 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 or the Chaparral SSX 287 2011?
The Chaparral SSX 287 2011 is the longer of the two at 28,8 feet overall. The Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 2,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 or the Chaparral SSX 287 2011?
For trailering, the Chaparral SSX 287 2011 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 5 275 lbs for the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral SSX 287 2011 measures 108" wide, compared to 102" for the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 or the Chaparral SSX 287 2011?
The Chaparral SSX 287 2011 has the bigger tank at 105 gallons, versus 8 gallons on the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008. That 97-gallon difference translates to roughly 291–485 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 and Chaparral SSX 287 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral SSi 256 Bow Rider 2008 and the Chaparral SSX 287 2011 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.