Chaparral Signature 310  2009 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Signature 310 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 256 2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 256 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral Signature 310 2009 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2010: Which Modified-V Boat Fits Your Needs?

Both the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 and the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Chaparral Signature 310 2009 measures 33,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 6,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 at 26,4 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 tips the scales at 11 400 lbs - 6 100 lbs more than the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 at 5 300 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 400 hp, the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 has a 80-hp advantage over the Chaparral Signature 310 2009's 320-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 carries 147 gallons versus 80 gallons in the Chaparral SSX 256 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Chaparral Signature 310 2009 at 33,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 at 26,4 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
ModelSignature 310
ModelSSX 256
Model Year2009
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam10 ft. 7 in. (3.23 m)
Beamnot available
Beam - Meters3.23
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Inches127
Beam - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail11 ft. 2 in. (3.4 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m) Without Arch Tower: 5 ft. 4 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters3.4
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Inches134
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise22°
Draft [drive up] - Detail25 in. (64 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.64
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] inches25
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches33
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail11,400 lbs. (5,171 kg)
Weight - Detail5,300 lbs. (2,404 kg)
Weight - kg5170.95
Weight - kg2404.04
Weight - lbs.11400
Weight - lbs.5300
Length - Meters10.16
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet33
Length - Feet26.42
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length [over all with swim platform]33 ft. 4 in. (10.16 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardTwin Volvo 5.0L GXi MPi DP 270 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail147 gal. (556 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters556.46
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Gal147
Fuel tank capacity - Gal80
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeI/O
Engine maxTwin 320 hp (239 kW)
Engine max400 hp (298 kW)
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 6 in. (1.98 m)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity5
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacity29 gal. (110 l)
Water capacity10 gal. (38 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8

Chaparral Signature 310 2009 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
The Chaparral Signature 310 2009 is the longer of the two at 33,0 feet overall. The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 comes in at 26,4 feet, making it roughly 6,6 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 has the edge at 5 300 lbs dry weight versus 11 400 lbs for the Chaparral Signature 310 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 is rated to a maximum of 400 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral Signature 310 2009 tops out at 320 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
The Chaparral Signature 310 2009 has the bigger tank at 147 gallons, versus 80 gallons on the Chaparral SSX 256 2010. That 67-gallon difference translates to roughly 201–335 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 and Chaparral SSX 256 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Chaparral Signature 310 2009 and the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.