Chaparral Signature 290  2013 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Signature 290 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral Signature 310  2011 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Signature 310 2011
2011
View full specs →

Chaparral Signature 290 2013 vs Chaparral Signature 310 2011 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 and the Chaparral Signature 310 2011 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral Signature 290 2013 at 29,0 ft versus Chaparral Signature 310 2011 at 31,0 ft. At 91 lbs and 106 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 540 hp, the Chaparral Signature 310 2011 has a 90-hp advantage over the Chaparral Signature 290 2013's 450-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral Signature 310 2011 carries 125 gallons versus 87 gallons in the Chaparral Signature 290 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral Signature 310 2011 and its 540-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 with its 450-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
ModelSignature 29
ModelSignature 31
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.90 m)
Beam10 ft. (3.50 m)
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters3.05
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches12
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m) With Arch: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.79 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Hardtop: 10 ft. 6 in. (3.2 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Meters3.2
Bridge clearance - Inches11
Bridge clearance - Inches126
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise19℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (43 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail23 in. (58 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] meters0.58
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [drive up] inches23
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (99 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Inches33
Draft [max] - Inches39
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. (4,128 kg)
Weight - Detail10,600 lbs. (4,808 kg)
Weight - kg4127.69
Weight - kg4808.08
Weight - lbs.91
Weight - lbs.106
Length - Feet29
Length - Feet31
Length [over all with swim platform]29 ft. (8.84 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]31 ft. (9.45 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail87 gal. (329 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters329.33
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal87
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Engine max450 hp (336 kW)
Engine max540 hp (403 kW)
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacity6
Water capacity29 gal. (110 l)
Water capacity40 gal. (151 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Holding tank capacity - Gal28

Chaparral Signature 290 2013 vs Chaparral Signature 310 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 310 2011?
The Chaparral Signature 310 2011 is the longer of the two at 31,0 feet overall. The Chaparral Signature 290 2013 comes in at 29,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 310 2011?
For trailering, the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 has the edge at 91 lbs dry weight versus 106 lbs for the Chaparral Signature 310 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral Signature 310 2011 is rated to a maximum of 540 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral Signature 290 2013 tops out at 450 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral Signature 290 2013 measures 114" wide, compared to 12" for the Chaparral Signature 310 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 310 2011?
The Chaparral Signature 310 2011 has the bigger tank at 125 gallons, versus 87 gallons on the Chaparral Signature 290 2013. That 38-gallon difference translates to roughly 114–190 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 and Chaparral Signature 310 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral Signature 290 2013 and the Chaparral Signature 310 2011 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.