Chaparral Signature 290  2012 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Signature 290 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 276  2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 276 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral Signature 290 2012 vs Chaparral SSX 276 2010: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Chaparral Signature 290 2012 is a deep-V design and the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Chaparral Signature 290 2012 at 29,0 ft versus Chaparral SSX 276 2010 at 28,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 tips the scales at 9 100 lbs - 2 300 lbs more than the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 at 6 800 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 525 hp, the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 has a 75-hp advantage over the Chaparral Signature 290 2012's 450-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 carries 105 gallons versus 100 gallons in the Chaparral Signature 290 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 and its 525-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 with its 450-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
ModelSignature 290
ModelSSX 276
Model Year2012
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.90 m)
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches108
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.79 m)Without Arch: 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 8 ft. 9 in. (2.67 m) Without Arch Tower: 6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Meters2.67
Bridge clearance - Inches110
Bridge clearance - Inches105
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise22°
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (43 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [drive up] inches20
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches33
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. (4,128 kg)
Weight - Detail6,800 lbs. (3,084 kg)
Weight - kg4127.69
Weight - kg3084.43
Weight - lbs.9100
Weight - lbs.6800
Length - Feet29
Length - Feet28.83
Length [over all with swim platform]29 ft. (8.84 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail105 gal. (397 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Liters397.47
Fuel tank capacity - Gal100
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeI/O
Engine max450 hp (336 kW)
Engine max525 hp (391 kW)
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacity29 gal. (110 l)
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peoplenot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8

Chaparral Signature 290 2012 vs Chaparral SSX 276 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 276 2010?
The Chaparral Signature 290 2012 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Chaparral SSX 276 2010 comes in at 28,8 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 276 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 has the edge at 6 800 lbs dry weight versus 9 100 lbs for the Chaparral Signature 290 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral SSX 276 2010 is rated to a maximum of 525 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral Signature 290 2012 tops out at 450 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral Signature 290 2012 measures 114" wide, compared to 108" for the Chaparral SSX 276 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 276 2010?
The Chaparral SSX 276 2010 has the bigger tank at 105 gallons, versus 100 gallons on the Chaparral Signature 290 2012. That 5-gallon difference translates to roughly 15–25 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 and Chaparral SSX 276 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Chaparral Signature 290 2012 and the Chaparral SSX 276 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.