Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 327 SSX 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 256 2007 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 256 2007
2007
View full specs →

Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 measures 32,4 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 6,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Chaparral SSX 256 2007 at 26,0 feet (2007). At 102 lbs and 53 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 860 hp, the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 has a 435-hp advantage over the Chaparral SSX 256 2007's 425-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 carries 15 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Chaparral SSX 256 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 at 32,4 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Chaparral SSX 256 2007 at 26,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model327 SSX
ModelSSX 256
Model Year2012
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam10 ft. (3.05 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters3.05
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches12
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Hardtop: 9 ft. 10 in. (3 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m) Without Arch: 5 ft. 5 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters3
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Inches118
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Deadrise22°
Deadrise22.5℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail23 in. (58 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.58
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] inches23
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Detail38.5 in. (98 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Meters0.61
Draft [max] - Inches38.5
Draft [max] - Inches24
Weight - Detail10,200 lbs. (4,627 kg)
Weight - Detail5,300 lbs. (2,404 kg)
Weight - kg4626.64
Weight - kg2404.04
Weight - lbs.102
Weight - lbs.53
Length - Feet32.42
Length - Feet26
Length [over all with swim platform]32 ft. 6 in. (9.91 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters91.44
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches36
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.05
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches5
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal. (568 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max860 hp (641 kW)
Engine max425 hp (317 kW)
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.7L 280 hp DP
Operational Info
Water capacity25 gal. (95 l)
Water capacity9.5 gal. (36 l)
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail15 gal (57 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l) With Optional VacuFlush: 6.5 gal. (25 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters56.78
Holding tank capacity - Liters26.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal15
Holding tank capacity - Gal6.5

Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2007?
The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 is the longer of the two at 32,4 feet overall. The Chaparral SSX 256 2007 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 6,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2007?
For trailering, the Chaparral SSX 256 2007 has the edge at 53 lbs dry weight versus 102 lbs for the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 is rated to a maximum of 860 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral SSX 256 2007 tops out at 425 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral SSX 256 2007 measures 102" wide, compared to 12" for the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2007?
The Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 has the bigger tank at 15 gallons, versus 8 gallons on the Chaparral SSX 256 2007. That 7-gallon difference translates to roughly 21–35 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 and Chaparral SSX 256 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral 327 SSX 2012 and the Chaparral SSX 256 2007 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.