Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 267 SSX 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSi 275  2009 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSi 275 2009
2009
View full specs →

Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 vs Chaparral SSi 275 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 against a deep vee Chaparral SSi 275 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 at 26,4 ft versus Chaparral SSi 275 2009 at 28,0 ft. At 53 lbs and 73 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 425 hp, the Chaparral SSi 275 2009 has a 25-hp advantage over the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012's 400-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral SSi 275 2009 carries 105 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral SSi 275 2009 and its 425-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 with its 400-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model267 SSX
ModelSSi 275
Model Year2012
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam9 ft. 0 in. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches108
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Radar Arch: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m) Without Radar Arch: 5 ft. 4 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 8 ft. 11 in. (2.72 m) Without Arch: 6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Meters2.72
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Bridge clearance - Inches107
Deadrise22.5°
Deadrise22℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail5,300 lbs. (2,404 kg)
Weight - Detail7,300 lbs. (3,311 kg)
Weight - kg2404.04
Weight - kg3311.22
Weight - lbs.53
Weight - lbs.73
Length - Feet26.42
Length - Feet28
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.79
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail105 gal. (397 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters397.47
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max400 hp (298 kW)
Engine max425 hp (317 kW)
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo 8.1L Gi DP 375 hp
Operational Info
Water capacity10 gal. (38 l)
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Maximum capacityYacht certified
Maximum capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l) With Optional VacuFlush: 6.5 gal. (24.6 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters26.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Holding tank capacity - Gal6.5
Headroomnot available
Headroom5 ft. 3 in. (1.6 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity2
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum peopleYacht certified

Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 vs Chaparral SSi 275 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSi 275 2009?
The Chaparral SSi 275 2009 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 comes in at 26,4 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSi 275 2009?
For trailering, the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 has the edge at 53 lbs dry weight versus 73 lbs for the Chaparral SSi 275 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral SSi 275 2009 is rated to a maximum of 425 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 tops out at 400 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral SSi 275 2009 measures 108" wide, compared to 102" for the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 or the Chaparral SSi 275 2009?
The Chaparral SSi 275 2009 has the bigger tank at 105 gallons, versus 8 gallons on the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012. That 97-gallon difference translates to roughly 291–485 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 and Chaparral SSi 275 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral 267 SSX 2012 and the Chaparral SSi 275 2009 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.