Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral Sunesta 264  2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 vs Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 against a modified vee Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 at 26,3 ft versus Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 at 26,3 ft. At 58 lbs and 54 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 430 hp, the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 has a 30-hp advantage over the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010's 400-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 8 gal and 8 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and its 430-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 with its 400-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model264 Xtreme
ModelSunesta 264
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 7 ft. 8 in. (2.34 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 7 ft. 8 in. (2.34 m) Without Arch Tower: 5 ft. 3 in. (1.6 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.34
Bridge clearance - Meters2.34
Bridge clearance - Inches92
Bridge clearance - Inches92
Deadrise22°
Deadrise22°
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (97 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (97 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Inches38
Draft [max] - Inches38
Weight - Detail5,800 lbs. (2,631 kg)
Weight - Detail5,400 lbs. (2,449 kg)
Weight - kg2630.83
Weight - kg2449.4
Weight - lbs.58
Weight - lbs.54
Length - Feet26.33
Length - Feet26.33
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 4 in. (8.03 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 4 in. (8.03 m)
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters8.03
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches316
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max430 hp (321 kW)
Engine max400 hp (298 kW)
Operational Info
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8

Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 vs Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 or the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010?
The Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 is the longer of the two at 26,3 feet overall. The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 comes in at 26,3 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 or the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 has the edge at 54 lbs dry weight versus 58 lbs for the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 is rated to a maximum of 430 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 tops out at 400 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 carry?
The Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 has an official capacity rating of 8 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 8 gallons and 8 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and the Chaparral Sunesta 264 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.