Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral Signature 290  2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Signature 290 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 vs Chaparral Signature 290 2010 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and the Chaparral Signature 290 2010 are deep vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 at 26,3 ft versus Chaparral Signature 290 2010 at 29,0 ft. At 58 lbs and 91 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 430 hp, the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 has a 205-hp advantage over the Chaparral Signature 290 2010's 225-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 carries 8 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Chaparral Signature 290 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Chaparral Signature 290 2010 at 29,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 at 26,3 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model264 Xtreme
ModelSignature 29
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.90 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches114
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 7 ft. 8 in. (2.34 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.79 m)Without Arch: 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.34
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches92
Bridge clearance - Inches11
Deadrise22°
Deadrise20℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (43 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [max] - Detail38 in. (97 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Inches38
Draft [max] - Inches33
Weight - Detail5,800 lbs. (2,631 kg)
Weight - Detail9,100 lbs. (4,128 kg)
Weight - kg2630.83
Weight - kg4127.69
Weight - lbs.58
Weight - lbs.91
Length - Feet26.33
Length - Feet29
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 4 in. (8.03 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]29 ft. (8.84 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Engine max430 hp (321 kW)
Engine maxTwin 225 hp (168 kW)
Operational Info
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Water capacity29 gal. (110 l)
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity6

Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 vs Chaparral Signature 290 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 290 2010?
The Chaparral Signature 290 2010 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 comes in at 26,3 feet, making it roughly 2,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 290 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 has the edge at 58 lbs dry weight versus 91 lbs for the Chaparral Signature 290 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 is rated to a maximum of 430 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral Signature 290 2010 tops out at 225 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Chaparral Signature 290 2010 measures 114" wide, compared to 102" for the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 or the Chaparral Signature 290 2010?
The Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 has the bigger tank at 8 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Chaparral Signature 290 2010. That 7-gallon difference translates to roughly 21–35 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and Chaparral Signature 290 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral 264 Xtreme 2013 and the Chaparral Signature 290 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.