Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 255 SSi 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008
2008
View full specs →

Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 vs Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 against a deep vee Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 at 26,4 ft versus Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 at 28,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 tips the scales at 554 lbs — 486 lbs more than the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 at 68 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 525 hp, the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 has a 150-hp advantage over the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010's 375-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 carries 105 gallons versus 8 gallons in the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 and its 525-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 with its 375-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model255 SSi
ModelSSX 276 Bow Rider
Model Year201
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 8 ft. (2.44 m) Without Arch Tower: 6 ft. 6 in. (1.98 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 8 ft. 9 in. (2.67 m) Without Arch: 6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.44
Bridge clearance - Meters2.67
Bridge clearance - Inches96
Bridge clearance - Inches105
Deadrise22.5°
Deadrise22℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail5,540 lbs. (2,513 kg)
Weight - Detail6,800 lbs. (3,084 kg)
Weight - kg2512.9
Weight - kg3084.43
Weight - lbs.554
Weight - lbs.68
Length - Feet26.42
Length - Feet28
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]28 ft. 10 in. (8.79 m)
Beamnot available
Beam9 ft. 0 in. (2.74 m)
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches108
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.79
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail105 gal. (397 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters397.47
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max375 hp (280 kW)
Engine max525 hp (391 kW)
Max no of enginesnot available
Max no of engines1
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.7 Gi MPi DP drive 300 hp
Operational Info
Headroom4 ft. 5 in. (1.35 cm)
Headroomnot available
Sleeping capacity2
Sleeping capacitynot available
Water capacity9.5 gal. (36 l)
Water capacity13.5 gal. (51 l)
Maximum peopleYacht Certified
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l) With Optional VacuFlush: 6.5 gal. (23.95 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters26.5
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Holding tank capacity - Gal6.5
Headnot available
Head1

Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 vs Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008?
The Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 comes in at 26,4 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008?
For trailering, the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 has the edge at 68 lbs dry weight versus 554 lbs for the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 is rated to a maximum of 525 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 tops out at 375 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008?
The Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 has the bigger tank at 105 gallons, versus 8 gallons on the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010. That 97-gallon difference translates to roughly 291–485 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 and Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 and the Chaparral SSX 276 Bow Rider 2008 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.