Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 255 SSi 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007
2007
View full specs →

Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 vs Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007: A Close Look at Two Modified-V Boats

Both the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 and the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 at 26,4 ft versus Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 at 29,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 tips the scales at 8 200 lbs - 2 660 lbs less than the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 at 5 540 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 375 hp, the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 has a 105-hp advantage over the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007's 270-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 carries 100 gallons versus 80 gallons in the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 at 29,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 at 26,4 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model255 SSi
Model280 Signature Cruiser
Model Year2010
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 8 ft. (2.44 m) Without Arch Tower: 6 ft. 6 in. (1.98 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.79 m) Without Arch: 7 ft 1 in. (2.16 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.44
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches96
Bridge clearance - Inches110
Deadrise22.5°
Deadrise20℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail17 in. (43 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches33
Weight - Detail5,540 lbs. (2,513 kg)
Weight - Detail8,200 lbs. (3,720 kg)
Weight - kg2512.9
Weight - kg3719.45
Weight - lbs.5540
Weight - lbs.8200
Length - Feet26.42
Length - Feet29
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]29 ft. 0 in. (8.84 m)
Beamnot available
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches114
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.84
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal80
Fuel tank capacity - Gal100
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Engine max375 hp (280 kW)
Engine maxTwin: 270 hp (201 kW)
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardTwin Volvo 4.3L 225 hp SX
Operational Info
Headroom4 ft. 5 in. (1.35 cm)
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Sleeping capacity2
Sleeping capacity6
Water capacity9.5 gal. (36 l)
Water capacity29 gal. (110 l)
Maximum peopleYacht Certified
Maximum peoplenot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Headnot available
Head1

Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 vs Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007?
The Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 comes in at 26,4 feet, making it roughly 2,6 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007?
For trailering, the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 has the edge at 5 540 lbs dry weight versus 8 200 lbs for the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 is rated to a maximum of 375 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 tops out at 270 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 or the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007?
The Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 has the bigger tank at 100 gallons, versus 80 gallons on the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 and Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Chaparral 255 SSi 2010 and the Chaparral 280 Signature Cruiser 2007 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.