Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral SSX 256 2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral SSX 256 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2010: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 is a deep-V design and the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 at 24,5 ft versus Chaparral SSX 256 2010 at 26,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 tips the scales at 5 300 lbs - 900 lbs less than the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 at 4 400 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 400 hp, the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 has a 80-hp advantage over the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013's 320-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 carries 80 gallons versus 64 gallons in the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

The Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 is rated for up to 14 people. Passenger data for the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 wasn't available.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 and its 400-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 with its 320-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model246 SSi WT
ModelSSX 256
Model Year2013
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beamnot available
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail4 ft. 8 in. (1.42 m) With Arch Tower: 7 ft. 11 in. (2.41 m) With Arch Tower Folded: 6 ft. 9 in. (2.06 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch Tower: 7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m) Without Arch Tower: 5 ft. 4 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.41
Bridge clearance - Meters2.36
Bridge clearance - Inches95
Bridge clearance - Inches93
Deadrise21°
Deadrise22°
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (41 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail4,400 lbs. (1,996 kg)
Weight - Detail5,300 lbs. (2,404 kg)
Weight - kg1995.8
Weight - kg2404.04
Weight - lbs.4400
Weight - lbs.5300
Length - Feet24.5
Length - Feet26.42
Length [over all with swim platform]24 ft. 6 in. (7.47 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 5 in. (8.05 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail64 gal. (242 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters242.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Gal64
Fuel tank capacity - Gal80
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp (239 kW)
Engine max400 hp (298 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people14 / 2,006 lbs.
Maximum peopleYacht certified
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity10 gal. (38 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail3.8 gal. (14 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal3.8

Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 vs Chaparral SSX 256 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 is the longer of the two at 26,4 feet overall. The Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 comes in at 24,5 feet, making it roughly 1,9 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 has the edge at 4 400 lbs dry weight versus 5 300 lbs for the Chaparral SSX 256 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 is rated to a maximum of 400 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 tops out at 320 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 carry?
The Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 has an official capacity rating of 14 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison - verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 or the Chaparral SSX 256 2010?
The Chaparral SSX 256 2010 has the bigger tank at 80 gallons, versus 64 gallons on the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013. That 16-gallon difference translates to roughly 48–80 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 and Chaparral SSX 256 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Chaparral 246 SSi WT 2013 and the Chaparral SSX 256 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.