Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Chaparral Sunesta 224  2010 boat specs
Chaparral
Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010
2010
View full specs →

Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 vs Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010: A Close Look at Two Modified-V Boats

Both the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 at 22,5 ft versus Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 at 22,3 ft. At 3 900 lbs and 4 000 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 300 hp for the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and 300 hp for the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 carries 55 gallons versus 50 gallons in the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 12 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeChaparral
MakeChaparral
Model226 SSi WT
ModelSunesta 224
Model Year2012
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Wakeboard Tower: 7 ft. 3 in. (2.21 m) Without Wakeboard Tower: 4 ft. 8 in. (1.42 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Wakeboard Tower: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.79 m) Without Wakeboard Tower: 5 ft. 5 in. (1.65 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.21
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches87
Bridge clearance - Inches110
Deadrise20°
Deadrise18 °
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in. (41 cm)
Draft [drive up] - Detail20 in. (51 cm)
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches20
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (89 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail3,900 lbs. (1,769 kg)
Weight - Detail4,000 lbs. (1,814 kg)
Weight - kg1769.01
Weight - kg1814.37
Weight - lbs.3900
Weight - lbs.4000
Length - Feet22.5
Length - Feet22.33
Length [over all with swim platform]22 ft. 6 in. (6.86 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]22 ft. 4 in. (6.81 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail55 gal. (208 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal. (189 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters208.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal55
Fuel tank capacity - Gal50
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max300 hp (224 kW)
Engine max300 hp (224 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum people12 or 1,650 lbs.
Maximum people12 or 1,750 lbs.
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity10 gal. (38 l)

Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 vs Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 or the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010?
The Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 is the longer of the two at 22,5 feet overall. The Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 comes in at 22,3 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 or the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010?
For trailering, the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 has the edge at 3 900 lbs dry weight versus 4 000 lbs for the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam - meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 or the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010?
The Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 has the bigger tank at 55 gallons, versus 50 gallons on the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010. That 5-gallon difference translates to roughly 15–25 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Chaparral 226 SSi WT 2012 and the Chaparral Sunesta 224 2010 are built by Chaparral. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.