Catana Catamarans 53 2017 boat specs
Catana Catamarans
Catana Catamarans 53 2017
2017
View full specs →
VS
Catana Catamarans 62 2016 boat specs
Catana Catamarans
Catana Catamarans 62 2016
2016
View full specs →

Catana Catamarans 53 2017 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 measures 61,4 feet overall (2016), giving it roughly 6,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 at 55,1 feet (2017). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 tips the scales at 42 329 lbs — 10 362 lbs less than the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 at 31 967 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 110 hp, the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 has a 50-hp advantage over the Catana Catamarans 53 2017's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 227 gal and 227 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is rated for 18 passengers, while the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 caps at 16. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 displaces 42 329 lbs — a 10 362-lb difference over the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 at 31 967 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 draws 12,4 ft, compared to 9,1 ft for the Catana Catamarans 53 2017. That 3,3-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 is rigged as a Fractional Sloop while the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 carries Sloop rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably. For auxiliary power the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 carries a 110-hp engine against 60 hp on the Catana Catamarans 53 2017. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Bottom line: The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 42 329 lbs displacement and 61 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 at 31 967 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail55.10 ft
Length overall - Detail61.40 ft
Length - Feet55.1
Length - Feet61.4
Length overall - Meters16.79
Length overall - Meters18.71
Length overall - Inches661
Length overall - Inches737
Beam28.50 ft
Beam31.10 ft
Beam - Meters8.69
Beam - Meters9.48
Beam - Inches342
Beam - Inches373
Draft [max] - Detail9.10 ft
Draft [max] - Detail12.40 ft
Draft [max] - Meters2.77
Draft [max] - Meters3.78
Draft [max] - Inches109
Draft [max] - Inches149
Draft Min2.58 ft
Draft Min5.10 ft
Displacement31967.00 lbs
Displacement42329.00 lbs
Body / Hull
RudderTwin spade rudders
RudderTwin spade rudders
HelmTwin helm wheels
HelmTwin helm wheels
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal227.2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal227.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters860.05
Fuel tank capacity - Liters860.05
Horsepower60 hp
Horsepower110 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Engine 2 Horsepower60 hp
Engine 2 Horsepower110 hp
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity1
Sleeping capacity1
Cabins4
Cabins5
Head5
Head5
Water capacity211.3
Water capacity211.3
RiggingFractional Sloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Catana Catamarans 53 2017 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is the longer of the two at 61,4 feet overall. The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 comes in at 55,1 feet, making it roughly 6,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
For trailering, the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 has the edge at 31 967 lbs dry weight versus 42 329 lbs for the Catana Catamarans 62 2016. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is rated to a maximum of 110 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 is Coast Guard rated for 16 passengers, while the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is certified for 18. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 has the deeper draft at 12,4 ft, versus 9,1 ft for the Catana Catamarans 53 2017. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 at 42 329 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Catana Catamarans 53 2017 at 31 967 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 measures 373" wide, compared to 342" for the Catana Catamarans 53 2017. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 and Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 227 gallons and 227 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 and Catana Catamarans 62 2016 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Catana Catamarans 53 2017 and the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 are built by Catana Catamarans. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.