Catana Catamarans 50 2008 boat specs
Catana Catamarans
Catana Catamarans 50 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Catana Catamarans 62 2016 boat specs
Catana Catamarans
Catana Catamarans 62 2016
2016
View full specs →

Catana Catamarans 50 2008 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 measures 61,4 feet overall (2016), giving it roughly 11,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 at 49,9 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 tips the scales at 42 329 lbs — 12 346 lbs less than the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 at 29 983 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 110 hp, the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 has a 56-hp advantage over the Catana Catamarans 50 2008's 54-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 227 gal and 227 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is rated for 18 passengers, while the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 caps at 15. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 displaces 42 329 lbs — a 12 346-lb difference over the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 at 29 983 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 draws 12,4 ft, compared to 9,7 ft for the Catana Catamarans 50 2008. That 2,7-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 is rigged as a Fractional Sloop while the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 carries Sloop rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably. For auxiliary power the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 carries a 110-hp engine against 54 hp on the Catana Catamarans 50 2008. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Bottom line: The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 42 329 lbs displacement and 61 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 at 29 983 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail49.87 ft
Length overall - Detail61.40 ft
Length - Feet49.87
Length - Feet61.4
Length overall - Meters15.2
Length overall - Meters18.71
Length overall - Inches598
Length overall - Inches737
Beam26.02 ft
Beam31.10 ft
Beam - Meters7.93
Beam - Meters9.48
Beam - Inches312
Beam - Inches373
Draft [max] - Detail9.68 ft
Draft [max] - Detail12.40 ft
Draft [max] - Meters2.95
Draft [max] - Meters3.78
Draft [max] - Inches116
Draft [max] - Inches149
Draft Min3.94 ft
Draft Min5.10 ft
Displacement29983.00 lbs
Displacement42329.00 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal227
Fuel tank capacity - Gal227.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters859.29
Fuel tank capacity - Liters860.05
Horsepower54 hp
Horsepower110 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Engine 2 Engine MakeVolvo
Engine 2 Engine Makenot available
Engine 2 Horsepower54 hp
Engine 2 Horsepower110 hp
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Drive typenot available
Drive typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typenot available
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity12
Sleeping capacity1
Cabins5
Cabins5
Head4
Head5
Water capacity211
Water capacity211.3
RiggingFractional Sloop
RiggingSloop
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Mast Configurationnot available
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Body / Hull
Ruddernot available
RudderTwin spade rudders
Helmnot available
HelmTwin helm wheels

Catana Catamarans 50 2008 vs Catana Catamarans 62 2016 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is the longer of the two at 61,4 feet overall. The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 comes in at 49,9 feet, making it roughly 11,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
For trailering, the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 has the edge at 29 983 lbs dry weight versus 42 329 lbs for the Catana Catamarans 62 2016. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is rated to a maximum of 110 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 tops out at 54 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 15 passengers, while the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 is certified for 18. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 has the deeper draft at 12,4 ft, versus 9,7 ft for the Catana Catamarans 50 2008. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 or the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 at 42 329 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Catana Catamarans 50 2008 at 29 983 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Catana Catamarans 62 2016 measures 373" wide, compared to 312" for the Catana Catamarans 50 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 and Catana Catamarans 62 2016?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 227 gallons and 227 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 and Catana Catamarans 62 2016 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Catana Catamarans 50 2008 and the Catana Catamarans 62 2016 are built by Catana Catamarans. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.