Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 boat specs
Caravelle
Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 boat specs
Caravelle
Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003
2003
View full specs →

Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 vs Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 vs Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 320 hp, the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 has a 95-hp advantage over the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003's 225-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 carries 36 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 21,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeCaravelle
MakeCaravelle
Model212 LS Bowrider
ModelSea Hawk 210 Center Console
Model Year2009
Model Year2003
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 0 in
Beam102 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise18 degrees
Draft [drive up] - DetailMercury: 17 in. Volvo: 22 in
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [max] - DetailMercury: 33 in. Volvo: 34 in
Draft [max] - Detail30 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.76
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches3
Weight - Detail3,300 lbs
Weight - Detail3100 lbs
Weight - kg1496.85
Weight - kg1406.14
Weight - lbs.33
Weight - lbs.31
Length - Feet21
Length - Feetnot available
Length overall - Detail21.0 ft
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Inches252
Length overall - Inches252
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardVolvo 5.0GL - 220 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail36 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters136.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal36
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Drive typenot available
Engine max320 hp
Engine max225
Operational Info
Maximum people7
Maximum peoplenot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailTennessee, tandem-axle with brakes
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Height6 ft. 1 in
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 6 in. (Removable trailer tongue will shorten length by approximately 26 in.)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 3 in
Trailer - Widthnot available

Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 vs Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 or the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003?
For trailering, the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 33 lbs for the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 is rated to a maximum of 320 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 tops out at 225 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 or the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003?
The Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 has the bigger tank at 36 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003. That 35-gallon difference translates to roughly 105–175 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 and Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Caravelle 212 LS Bowrider 2009 and the Caravelle Sea Hawk 210 Center Console 2003 are built by Caravelle. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.