Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 boat specs
Bryant
Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Bryant 240 2006 boat specs
Bryant
Bryant 240 2006
2006
View full specs →

Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 vs Bryant 240 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 vs Bryant 240 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 at 21,0 ft versus Bryant 240 2006 at 24,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 tips the scales at 3 075 lbs — 2 607 lbs more than the Bryant 240 2006 at 468 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 has a 292-hp advantage over the Bryant 240 2006's 8-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bryant 240 2006 carries 63 gallons versus 31 gallons in the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Bryant 240 2006 at 24,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 at 21,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeBryant
MakeBryant
Model210 Starboard Transom Entry
Model24
Model Year2012
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft
Beam102 in. (8 ft. 6 in.)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise17℃ at transom
Deadrise23 ℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail16 in
Draft [drive up] - Detail24 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.41
Draft [drive up] meters0.61
Draft [drive up] inches16
Draft [drive up] inches24
Draft [max] - Detail30 in
Draft [max] - Detail37 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.76
Draft [max] - Meters0.94
Draft [max] - Inches3
Draft [max] - Inches37
Weight - Detail3,075 lbs
Weight - Detail4,680 lbs
Weight - kg1394.8
Weight - kg2122.81
Weight - lbs.3075
Weight - lbs.468
Height - Detail6 ft. 8 in. with trailer
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters2.03
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches8
Height - Inchesnot available
Length - Feet21
Length - Feet24
Length [over all with swim platform]21 ft
Length [over all with swim platform]26 ft. 6 in
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters7.39
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches291
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury MerCruiser
Engine makenot available
Engine model3.0 L MPI Alpha with catalyst, 135 hp
Engine modelnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail63 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Liters238.48
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31
Fuel tank capacity - Gal63
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max300 hp
Engine max8.1 l
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard5.7 l
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r, tandem axle, brakes on 1 axle
Trailer - Detailnot available

Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 vs Bryant 240 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 or the Bryant 240 2006?
The Bryant 240 2006 is the longer of the two at 24,0 feet overall. The Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 comes in at 21,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 or the Bryant 240 2006?
For trailering, the Bryant 240 2006 has the edge at 468 lbs dry weight versus 3 075 lbs for the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Bryant 240 2006 tops out at 8 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Bryant 240 2006 carry?
The Bryant 240 2006 has an official capacity rating of 7 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bryant 240 2006 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 or the Bryant 240 2006?
The Bryant 240 2006 has the bigger tank at 63 gallons, versus 31 gallons on the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012. That 32-gallon difference translates to roughly 96–160 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 and Bryant 240 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bryant 210 Starboard Transom Entry 2012 and the Bryant 240 2006 are built by Bryant. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.